an inspector calls model answers pdf

J.B. Priestley’s “An Inspector Calls” is a three-act play that premiered in 1945, exploring the Birling family’s involvement in a young woman’s death. The play uses an unconventional approach to a detective story, focusing on social responsibility.

Overview of J.B. Priestley’s Play

J.B. Priestley’s “An Inspector Calls,” first performed in 1945, is a compelling play that transcends the traditional detective genre. It uniquely examines the social responsibility of a wealthy family, the Birlings, after a mysterious inspector arrives. Instead of focusing on a whodunit narrative, the play delves into the moral implications of each family member’s actions regarding the suicide of Eva Smith/Daisy Renton. Priestley uses the dramatic setting of 1912 to explore themes of class divisions, guilt, and the consequences of individual choices. The play serves as a powerful critique of Edwardian society’s complacency and a call for collective responsibility, making it a thought-provoking piece that transcends its historical context. Its innovative structure and dramatic irony contribute to its lasting impact, prompting audiences to consider their own roles in societal well-being.

Plot and Structure

The play unfolds in three acts, centered around the Birling family’s interrogation. A mysterious Inspector questions their involvement in Eva Smith’s death, revealing their interconnected actions.

Summary of the Play’s Events

The play begins with the Birling family celebrating Sheila’s engagement to Gerald Croft. Their celebratory mood is disrupted by the arrival of Inspector Goole, who announces the suicide of a young woman, Eva Smith. The Inspector proceeds to interrogate each family member, revealing their individual connections to the deceased. Through these interrogations, the audience learns of the Birlings’ selfish and callous actions towards Eva. Arthur Birling, Sheila, Gerald Croft, Sybil Birling and Eric all face scrutiny. The Inspector reveals how each of their actions contributed to Eva’s despair, highlighting a chain of events. The play ends with a phone call, suggesting that the events may not be over, leaving the audience to reflect on the family’s moral responsibility. The dramatic irony throughout the play enhances the sense of judgment and consequence.

The Three-Act Structure

“An Inspector Calls” is structured in three distinct acts, each serving a specific purpose in unfolding the drama. Act One introduces the Birling family and their comfortable, self-satisfied lives, setting the scene before the Inspector’s arrival. This act establishes the initial state of the family’s dynamics and their complacent attitudes. Act Two focuses on the Inspector’s interrogation of each family member, gradually revealing their individual culpability in Eva Smith’s demise. This act builds tension and exposes the family’s secrets and moral failings. Finally, Act Three explores the consequences of the revelations. It questions the nature of the Inspector and the family’s reaction. The three-act structure heightens the dramatic impact of the play, moving from a seemingly normal gathering to a moral reckoning, ending with unresolved questions about the nature of responsibility and justice.

Character Analysis

The play features a range of characters, including the Birling family, Inspector Goole, and Eva Smith/Daisy Renton. Their interactions reveal themes of social class, responsibility, and moral accountability within a complex narrative.

The Birling Family Dynamics

The Birling family, consisting of Arthur, Sybil, Sheila, and Eric, represents the complacent, upper-middle class of Edwardian England. Arthur, the patriarch, is a self-made businessman concerned with social status and reputation, often prioritizing his own interests over others. Sybil, his wife, is cold and socially conscious, displaying a lack of empathy for those she deems lower in status. Sheila, initially naive, undergoes a significant transformation as she recognizes her role in Eva’s demise. Eric, the younger son, struggles with alcoholism and a sense of guilt, highlighting his moral weakness. Their interactions reveal a family deeply entrenched in their own privilege, initially unwilling to accept responsibility for their actions. Each member’s individual flaws and prejudices contribute to the tragic chain of events, illustrating the corrupting influence of class and self-interest within a seemingly respectable family.

Inspector Goole’s Role

Inspector Goole’s role is pivotal to the play’s dramatic and thematic impact. He arrives unexpectedly, disrupting the Birlings’ celebratory dinner and initiating an intense interrogation regarding their individual connections to Eva Smith’s suicide. He acts as a catalyst, exposing the family’s hidden secrets and moral failings. His methodical questioning and calm demeanor contrasts with the Birlings’ increasing defensiveness and panic. Goole’s seemingly omniscient knowledge and ability to connect their individual actions to a collective responsibility further emphasizes his role as a moral judge. The play leaves the audience questioning his true nature, whether he is a genuine police inspector or a supernatural force, making him a symbol of conscience, social justice, and the consequences of individual actions within a society. His role is not to solve a crime, but to force the characters to confront their own guilt.

Eva Smith/Daisy Renton’s Significance

Eva Smith, also known as Daisy Renton, is a central figure in “An Inspector Calls,” even though she never appears on stage. She represents the vulnerable working class, highlighting the social inequalities of the Edwardian era. Her tragic story serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of the Birlings’ selfish actions and lack of social responsibility. Eva/Daisy is not just an individual but a symbol of countless marginalized individuals who suffer due to the callousness and exploitation of the wealthy. Her dual identity signifies that she was subjected to different forms of exploitation and mistreatment. The inspector uses her death to expose the moral bankruptcy of the Birling family and force them to confront their interconnectedness with society. She embodies the theme of social justice and acts as a catalyst for character development and the play’s central message about collective responsibility.

Themes and Motifs

“An Inspector Calls” explores key themes such as social responsibility, class division, and moral accountability. The play uses these to examine the consequences of individual actions on society.

Social Responsibility

A central theme in “An Inspector Calls” is the concept of social responsibility, which Priestley emphasizes through the Birlings’ actions and the Inspector’s interrogations. The play challenges the Edwardian era’s individualistic mindset, advocating for a collective responsibility where everyone is accountable for their actions’ impact on society. The Inspector repeatedly stresses that we are all members of one body and are responsible for each other. The Birlings’ initial denial of any responsibility for Eva Smith’s fate is contrasted with the Inspector’s assertion that “we are responsible for each other.” This theme is further highlighted by the younger generation’s gradual acceptance of their roles, while the older generation resists this notion. This exploration of social responsibility serves to promote the necessity of empathy and compassion in a society, and to consider that actions have far reaching consequences.

Class Division and Inequality

The play “An Inspector Calls” sharply critiques class divisions and inequality prevalent in early 20th-century Britain. The Birling family, representing the upper-middle class, demonstrate a dismissive attitude towards the working class, as seen in their treatment of Eva Smith; Their exploitation of her and others in similar positions highlights the vast power imbalance that existed. This class structure allows the Birlings to avoid taking responsibility for their actions, believing they are above accountability. Priestley uses Eva Smith’s tragic fate to expose the harsh realities of social inequality and the vulnerability of those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. The play underscores how the privileged often disregard the suffering of the less fortunate due to their positions of power and wealth. This theme of class divisions and inequality is a central critique of the society the characters inhabit.

Guilt and Moral Accountability

“An Inspector Calls” delves deeply into the themes of guilt and moral accountability, exploring how the Birling family’s actions contribute to Eva Smith’s tragic end. Each family member is forced to confront their individual roles in her suffering. The Inspector’s interrogation reveals that their self-centered behavior and lack of empathy create a web of responsibility that leads to her death. Priestley highlights that social class does not exempt one from moral duty and accountability. The play challenges the audience to consider their own actions and whether they contribute to the suffering of others. The characters’ initial denial and attempts to deflect blame contrast sharply with the Inspector’s insistence on shared responsibility. Ultimately, “An Inspector Calls” serves as a warning against dismissing personal guilt and neglecting moral obligations within society.

Historical and Social Context

Set in 1912, “An Inspector Calls” reflects Edwardian England’s class divisions and the burgeoning socialist ideals of the post-war era. The play critiques the capitalist values of the time.

Setting in 1912 Edwardian England

The play’s setting in 1912 Edwardian England is crucial, representing a time of apparent prosperity and rigid social hierarchies. This era was marked by a strong class system, with the wealthy elite like the Birlings enjoying significant privilege and power. Industrial expansion was underway, yet a large portion of the population faced poverty and hardship. Social mobility was limited, and the dominant ideology favored individual gain over collective responsibility. The Birlings’ comfortable lifestyle contrasts sharply with the struggles of the working class, setting the stage for the play’s exploration of inequality. The confidence and complacency of the Edwardian era are challenged by the impending events of the First World War, which are foreshadowed in the play’s dramatic irony. This historical backdrop intensifies the play’s critique of social injustice. The rigid class system and the lack of social responsibility prevalent at the time are key elements that inform the characters’ actions and the Inspector’s judgment.

Post-War Socialist Ideologies

Written in 1944/45 and first performed just after World War II, “An Inspector Calls” reflects the rise of post-war socialist ideologies. The play critiques the pre-war capitalist values of the Birlings, advocating instead for social justice and collective responsibility. The devastating consequences of the two world wars had led to a growing awareness of the interconnectedness of society, challenging the individualistic outlook of the Edwardian era. The play’s emphasis on shared guilt and responsibility aligns with socialist principles, which promote a more egalitarian society. Priestley uses the play to express his own socialist beliefs, highlighting the need for empathy and moral accountability. The contrast between the Birlings’ self-serving actions and the Inspector’s message reflects a shift in societal values. The play encourages audiences to consider a more compassionate and just social order and this resonated strongly with a public that had endured the shared hardships of war and were looking towards a more unified future.

Critical Analysis and Interpretations

The play is often viewed as a morality play, forcing characters to face judgment for their actions. Interpretations vary, particularly around the nature of Inspector Goole, with some suggesting supernatural elements.

The Play as a Morality Play

“An Inspector Calls” functions effectively as a morality play, presenting characters who embody various vices and virtues, prompting audiences to reflect on their own ethical conduct. The arrival of Inspector Goole serves as a catalyst, forcing the Birling family to confront their selfish actions and their impact on others. The play’s narrative structure, reminiscent of a medieval morality play, guides the characters through a process of self-examination and judgment. The prospect of public scandal, as they fear, mirrors societal judgment, while the final phone call suggests that actions have real and lasting consequences. The dramatic irony, where the audience is often aware of more than the characters, emphasizes the moral decay within the family and highlights the need for compassion and responsibility. The inspector’s role is less of a detective and more of a moral guide, steering the characters, and the audience, towards a deeper understanding of social justice and human suffering. The play ultimately serves as a powerful reminder that personal choices have societal implications, promoting a message of collective responsibility.

Interpretations of Inspector Goole’s Nature

Inspector Goole’s character in “An Inspector Calls” has spurred numerous interpretations, ranging from a supernatural entity to a symbolic representation of collective conscience. Some view him as a ghost-like figure akin to those in “A Christmas Carol,” who appears to reveal the Birlings’ wrongdoings and seek justice for Eva Smith. Others suggest he embodies a social conscience, a force for change that challenges the family’s complacency and capitalist mindset. Some critical analyses suggest the inspector might be a manifestation of the play’s socialist ideologies, pushing the Birlings towards a sense of community and responsibility. His omniscience and ability to reveal the family’s secrets further fuel speculation about his true nature. The ambiguity surrounding his identity serves to enhance the play’s moral message, leaving the audience to ponder the source of his authority and the implications of his pronouncements. Whether supernatural, symbolic, or social, Inspector Goole is undeniably a powerful catalyst for self-reflection and change.